Given the Stakes, Should the NFL Have Selected a Different Investigator in Deflategate?

Wells Independence QuestionedYesterday’s press conference by Ted Wells defending the independence of his internal investigation should serve as a reminder of the importance of selecting an investigator who will not only be independent and impartial but also be perceived as independent and impartial.

Wells and his law firm Paul Weiss had been retained by the NFL earlier this year to conduct an independent and impartial investigation into allegations that the Patriots intentionally deflated footballs in the AFC Championship Game against the Colts.

As an organization faced with the need to retain an attorney to conduct an impartial internal investigation into an allegation of misconduct, the NFL was faced with a balancing act.

On the one hand, as regular legal counsel to the NFL, Ted Wells was familiar with the NFL.  Wells had done prior investigations for the NFL and together with his colleagues at the law firm of Paul Weiss is defending the NFL in a lawsuit brought by former NFL players alleging the league deliberately and fraudulently ignored the risks of neurological damage caused by repeated blows to the head that the players suffered.

As such, Wells  was a good candidate for the investigation because he could more easily navigate the organization resulting presumably in an ability to more quickly conduct and conclude the investigation.

On the other hand, the existing relationship between Ted Wells and his law firm would create at least the appearance of a potential conflict of interest, i.e. did Wells make close calls in favor of the NFL in order to keep his current work with the NFL and curry favor for future work?

Here are my two cents: As a general matter, the higher the stakes of the investigation the more important it is to avoid even the appearance of a conflict of interest.  If an investigation is more routine in nature – think employment claims of harassment or discrimination or a potential regulatory compliance violation — then using an attorney at an organization’s regular law firm may be appropriate.

But, where – as was the case with the NFL investigation of the Patriots and Tom Brady – the stakes are high and everyone knows the report will be subject to significant media and legal scrutiny why create even the perception of a conflict of interest by selecting an attorney at the NFL’s regular law firm.

There are any number of well-qualified attorneys in the United States available to conduct an independent investigation of this type.  Given the stakes, one has to ask whether the NFL would have been better served to have selected one of those other well-qualified attorneys to conduct this investigation.

_____________________________________

workplace investigations groupWorkplace Investigation Group offers a national directory of well-qualified attorneys who conduct impartial internal investigations.  It also delivers training to in-house counsel, risk managers, human resources professionals and others on how to conduct internal investigations that will withstand third-party scrutiny.  Click here for information on upcoming training in Jacksonville, FL, Washington, D.C., Philadelphia, PA, and Atlanta, GA.

Comments

Given the Stakes, Should the NFL Have Selected a Different Investigator in Deflategate? — 3 Comments

  1. I have no problem with the NFL using Ted Wells to do the investigation. He has done various investigations in many different matters, and is not afraid to “call it as he sees it.” His integrity is beyond reproach. Regardless of his current law firm (he was employed by a New Jersy firm for a long time), I would not hesitate to ask him to perform an important investigation in any case.

  2. John, Thanks for your comment. In writing this post, I am in no way questioning Ted Wells’ personal or professional integrity. Indeed, from where I sit both appear exemplary and I think both the investigation report he prepared in the Miami Dolphins case as well as in this investigation are well done, thorough and very balanced. In fact, I highlighted his investigation and investigation report in the Miami Dolphins case as being well done in an article on this blog: http://winwinhr.com/miami-dolphins-investigation-good-example-of-well-done-internal-workplace-investigation/

    The issue I raise for discussion in my blog post is whether given the stakes of this situation and the likelihood that he would be criticized as having a conflict of interest, the NFL would have been better off selecting from among the many other well-qualified attorneys who would not have been subject to this type of criticism. Thanks again for taking the time to join the discussion and share your insights. Lorene

    • I understand what you’re saying, Lorene, but I know of Ted’s work, and despite the problem of appearances, he is probably the only person I would ever 100% trust in an important matter.